MnSGC logo|Minnesota Space Grant Consortium
Adjust Font Size: Normal Large X-Large

Grant Proposal Checklist

  1. Cover letter. This must not exceed one page. Keep it succinct. Address the letter to a specific person, not to an unnamed foundation secretary.
  2. Title Page. The title page should contain the following information: the title of the proposal; your name and title; and the date.
  3. Confidentiality Information. A statement used on the title page when patentable information is contained in the proposal.
  4. Table of Contents. A list of the proposal's major sections and corresponding page numbers.
  5. Abstract. A non-technical synopsis of the project plan.
  6. Objectives. State you objectives in measurable terms, with a definite time-line that shows the changes in the project period.
  7. Methodology. Explain what you will do in order to accomplish each objective.
  8. Literature Review or Related Studies. A list of publications or previous research on which the proposal builds.
  9. Personnel. The personnel page should contain a list of individuals working on the project and their roles. Be able to provide a current resume of the proposed Project Director and other staff members or consultants you propose to include in the budget.
  10. Research Plan/Project Description. A detailed technical description of the project.
  11. Methodology and Timing. Summarize in a clear format what will happen by what time period, from the start of funding, to when you project the activities to end.
  12. Budget. List all costs in an easy-to-read format.
  13. Budget Justification. A written explanation for why each budget itme is necessary.
  14. Program Income. Funds genereated by the sponsored activity.
  15. Other Support. Any financial support (current or pending) an individual is receiving for other projects.
  16. Evaluation. How will you measure the effectiveness of the project? How will you track the objectives? Be able to describe how the project will be continued after grant funds cease.
  17. Bibliography. A list of all references cited in the proposal.
  18. Appendices (if allowed). Could include CV's, proposed surveys, small business plan, or other materials.

Other advice for an outline or a proposal:

Be specific; avoid generalizations and unmeasurable claims. Avoid use of 'boilerplate' material left over from prior proposal efforts, especially if the proposal wasn't funded. Avoid the passive voice--make sure each sentence has a subject and you will be clear who is going to do what, to whom. Responsibility for the pre-award process lies with the Principal Investigator (PI) regardless of the delegation of tasks. And, write the budget carefully!

Sources of information for this document:

  1. "The College of St. Catherine Grant Proposal Outline" by Linnea Sodergran.
  2. "Important Elements of a Grant Proposal" Electronic Learning Special Edition," Feb. 1993.
  3. "Sponsored Projects Administration Pre-Award," adapted from Managing Sponsored Projects at the University of Minnesota, Dec. 1996.

Notes on Evaluation Design

To make a convincing case for any reforms brought about by your project, you will need to collect some type of baseline data for pre-and post-comparisons. You will also need to consider:

  • Limiting yourself to a few clear and specific objectives that have measurable qualitities.
  • Selecting measures that specify who, when, and how the data will be collected, analyzed, and reported.
  • Building evaluation measures into the routines of program procedures, rather than appending them later.
  • Using multiple measures, rather than a single measure, when possible. (Similar results from "triangulation" of data establish credibility).
  • Orienting evaluation measures primarily toward behavior, especially student (or object) performance.
  • Using project documents and records for on-going process evaluation.
  • Consulting with evaluation experts at your institution early in the design of the project's evaluation.
  • Engaging an independent evaluator who does not stand to gain personally or professionally from the results of the evaluation.
  • Designing an evaluation that takes into account the project's eventual dissemination audiences and potential adapters and their data needs.
  • Collecting information on the projects' cost-effectiveness.
  • Providing evidence of the wider impact of your project: how transportable is the model and how likely is institutionalization?

By: Dora Marcus, FIPSE (Funding for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education, U.S. Dept. of Education)


Last Modified: 2012-04-19 at 11:22:15 -- this is in International Standard Date and Time Notation