CSE 1012 -- New Course

Mon Sep 21 11:22:09 2015

Approvals Received:
Department
on 07-28-15
by Joseph Nieszner
(nies0024@umn.edu)
Approvals Pending: College/Dean  > Provost > Catalog
Effective Status: Active
Effective Term: 1163 - Spring 2016
Course: CSE 1012
Institution:
Campus:
UMNTC - Twin Cities/Rochester
UMNTC - Twin Cities
Career: UGRD
College: TIOT - College of Science and Engineering
Department: 11055 - Sci and Engineer, Coll of-Adm
General
Course Title Short: Project-based Inquiry
Course Title Long: Project-based Inquiry
Max-Min Credits
for Course:
3.0 to 1.0 credit(s)
Catalog
Description:
Faculty-mentored project. Individual or team study that aligns with instructor's interests. Negotiation of deliverables/conduct of open-ended investigation into topic of interest to develop model, conduct experiment, or fabricate design. Presentation of results/findings.

prereq: 1001
Print in Catalog?: Yes
CCE Catalog
Description:
<no text provided>
Grading Basis: A-F only
Topics Course: Yes
Honors Course: No
Online Course: No
Instructor
Contact Hours:
1.0 hours per week
Course Typically Offered: Every Spring
Component 1 : LAB (no final exam)
Auto-Enroll
Course:
Yes
Graded
Component:
LAB
Academic
Progress Units:
Not allowed to bypass limits.
1.0 credit(s)
Financial Aid
Progress Units:
Not allowed to bypass limits.
1.0 credit(s)
Repetition of
Course:
Repetition not allowed.
Course
Prerequisites
for Catalog:
<no text provided>
Course
Equivalency:
No course equivalencies
Add Consent
Requirement:
Department
Drop Consent
Requirement:
No required consent
Enforced
Prerequisites:
(course-based or
non-course-based)
004252 - CSE 1001
Editor Comments: <no text provided>
Proposal Changes: <no text provided>
History Information: <no text provided>
Faculty
Sponsor Name:
Faculty
Sponsor E-mail Address:
Liberal Education
Requirement
this course fulfills:
None
Other requirement
this course fulfills:
None
Criteria for
Core Courses:
Describe how the course meets the specific bullet points for the proposed core requirement. Give concrete and detailed examples for the course syllabus, detailed outline, laboratory material, student projects, or other instructional materials or method.

Core courses must meet the following requirements:

  • They explicitly help students understand what liberal education is, how the content and the substance of this course enhance a liberal education, and what this means for them as students and as citizens.
  • They employ teaching and learning strategies that engage students with doing the work of the field, not just reading about it.
  • They include small group experiences (such as discussion sections or labs) and use writing as appropriate to the discipline to help students learn and reflect on their learning.
  • They do not (except in rare and clearly justified cases) have prerequisites beyond the University's entrance requirements.
  • They are offered on a regular schedule.
  • They are taught by regular faculty or under exceptional circumstances by instructors on continuing appointments. Departments proposing instructors other than regular faculty must provide documentation of how such instructors will be trained and supervised to ensure consistency and continuity in courses.

<no text provided>
Criteria for
Theme Courses:
Describe how the course meets the specific bullet points for the proposed theme requirement. Give concrete and detailed examples for the course syllabus, detailed outline, laboratory material, student projects, or other instructional materials or methods.

Theme courses have the common goal of cultivating in students a number of habits of mind:
  • thinking ethically about important challenges facing our society and world;
  • reflecting on the shared sense of responsibility required to build and maintain community;
  • connecting knowledge and practice;
  • fostering a stronger sense of our roles as historical agents.


<no text provided>
LE Recertification-Reflection Statement:
(for LE courses being re-certified only)
<no text provided>
Statement of Certification: This course is certified for a Core, effective as of 
This course is certified for a Theme, effective as of 
Writing Intensive
Propose this course
as Writing Intensive
curriculum:
No
Question 1 (see CWB Requirement 1): How do writing assignments and writing instruction further the learning objectives of this course and how is writing integrated into the course? Note that the syllabus must reflect the critical role that writing plays in the course.

<no text provided>
Question 2 (see CWB Requirement 2): What types of writing (e.g., research papers, problem sets, presentations, technical documents, lab reports, essays, journaling etc.) will be assigned? Explain how these assignments meet the requirement that writing be a significant part of the course work, including details about multi-authored assignments, if any. Include the required length for each writing assignment and demonstrate how the minimum word count (or its equivalent) for finished writing will be met.

<no text provided>
Question 3 (see CWB Requirement 3): How will students' final course grade depend on their writing performance? What percentage of the course grade will depend on the quality and level of the student's writing compared to the percentage of the grade that depends on the course content? Note that this information must also be on the syllabus.

<no text provided>
Question 4 (see CWB Requirement 4): Indicate which assignment(s) students will be required to revise and resubmit after feedback from the instructor. Indicate who will be providing the feedback. Include an example of the assignment instructions you are likely to use for this assignment or assignments.

<no text provided>
Question 5 (see CWB Requirement 5): What types of writing instruction will be experienced by students? How much class time will be devoted to explicit writing instruction and at what points in the semester? What types of writing support and resources will be provided to students?

<no text provided>
Question 6 (see CWB Requirement 6): If teaching assistants will participate in writing assessment and writing instruction, explain how will they be trained (e.g. in how to review, grade and respond to student writing) and how will they be supervised. If the course is taught in multiple sections with multiple faculty (e.g. a capstone directed studies course), explain how every faculty mentor will ensure that their students will receive a writing intensive experience.

<no text provided>
Statement of Certification: This course is certified as Writing Internsive effective  as of 
Course Syllabus
Course Syllabus: For new courses and courses in which changes in content and/or description and/or credits are proposed, please provide a syllabus that includes the following information: course goals and description; format;structure of the course (proposed number of instructor contact hours per week, student workload effort per week, etc.); topics to be covered; scope and nature of assigned readings (text, authors, frequency, amount per week); required course assignments; nature of any student projects; and how students will be evaluated. The University "Syllabi Policy" can be found here

The University policy on credits is found under Section 4A of "Standards for Semester Conversion" found here. Course syllabus information will be retained in this system until new syllabus information is entered with the next major course modification. This course syllabus information may not correspond to the course as offered in a particular semester.

(Please limit text to about 12 pages. Text copied and pasted from other sources will not retain formatting and special characters might not copy properly.)


Proposal   |   CSE 1012: Project-based Inquiry

Course Title:        CSE 1012: Project-based Inquiry
Term(s) offered:        Spring semester
Prerequisites:        CSE 1001
Credits & grading:        1-3 credits, A-F
Catalog Description:
This course engages students in a faculty-mentored investigation. Working individually or as a team, students choose a field of study that aligns with the instructor's interests. Students negotiate deliverables and conduct an open-ended investigation into the topic of interest, develop a physical model and present results and findings.

Textbook(s)/Required Materials:        none

Prepared by:        Frank Kelso, Paul Strykowski

Date of preparation:        July 13, 2015

Course Leader(s):        Frank Kelso, Paul Strykowski

Class Schedule:
        One 50 minute lecture each week

Course Topics:
        Research and investigation topics of interest, as identified by instructor

Course Objectives:
1.        Formulate basic question(s) to be investigated
2.        conduct an open-ended investigation
3.        develop a physical model or prototype

Course Outcomes:
At the conclusion of the course, students will have
1.        Experience in designing, conducting and documenting a scientific investigation
2.        Experience developing oral and written summaries of work progress and results
3.        Contributed to the Spring CSE Expo
4.     Gain teamwork and leadership skills

Assessment Tools:
1. Attendance
2. Intermediate report
3. Final report
4. Model or prototype
5. Project presentation / demonstration
Strategic Objectives & Consultation
Name of Department Chair
Approver:
Paul Strykowski
Strategic Objectives -
Curricular Objectives:
How does adding this course improve the overall curricular objectives ofthe unit?

Adds to the freshman experience in the college as they get to do topics of interest sooner.
Strategic Objectives - Core
Curriculum:
Does the unit consider this course to be part of its core curriculum?

no, optional course, not a degree requirement
Strategic Objectives -
Consultation with Other
Units:
In order to prevent course overlap and to inform other departments of new curriculum, circulate proposal to chairs in relevant units and follow-up with direct consultation. Please summarize response from units consulted and include correspondence. By consultation with other units, the information about a new course is more widely disseminated and can have a positive impact on enrollments. The consultation can be as simple as an email to the department chair informing them of the course and asking for any feedback from the faculty.

This is a CSE specific course that follows CSE 1001.  The projects are constructed by CSE faculty, so there can be no overlap.