Skip to main content. Gold  University of Minnesota M.University of Minnesota. Home page.
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
Adjust Font Size: Normal Large X-Large

Return to Publication List

Laminar and turbulent comparisons for channel flow and flow control

by

I. Marusic, D.D. Joseph & K. Mahesh

in

Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 570: 467-477, 2007.

Category: Journal Article

Click here to request an electronic copy of this paper.

Abstract:

A formula is derived that shows exactly how much the discrepancy between the volume flux in laminar and in turbulent flow at the same pressure gradient increases as the pressure gradient is increased. We compare laminar and turbulent flows in channels with and without flow control. For the related problem of a fixed bulk-Reynolds-number flow, we seek the theoretical lowest bound for skin-friction drag for control schemes that use surface blowing and suction with zero-net volume-flux addition. For one such case, using a crossflow approach, we show that sustained drag below that of the laminar-Poiseuille-flow case is not possible. For more general control strategies we derive a criterion for achieving sublaminar drag and use this to consider the implications for control strategy design and the limitations at high Reynolds numbers.


This entry has been accessed 1934 times.

Return to Publication List

©2007 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Trouble seeing the text? | Contact U of M | Privacy
Page problems?
Email: wwwmaster AT-SYMBOL aem.umn.edu